Authentic Assessment Management Strategies for Enhancing Student Creativity in Islamic Education: A Systematic Literature Review

  • M. Yusuf Aminuddin STAI Senori Tuban
Keywords: Authentic assessment, Management strategy, Creativity, Islamic education

Abstract

through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach. The literature search was conducted using Harzing Publish or Perish (PoP) from the Scopus, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, and Crossref databases, and supported by Elicit as an additional source. The literature selection process followed PRISMA 2020 with inclusion criteria: journal articles indexed by SINTA and Scopus published in the 2020-2025 period, and relevant to the research topic. Of the 1,212 identified articles, 8 articles met the criteria and were analyzed in depth. The results of the study indicate that authentic assessment contributes to the development of student creativity through the integration of cognitive, affective, and psychomotor aspects, the application of contextual tasks, and the provision of constructive feedback in the learning process. In its implementation, it still faces obstacles, especially in classes with large numbers, so that the assessment of attitudes and skills aspects is not optimal. Strengthening the management of authentic assessment systematically and consistently is needed to support more meaningful learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdillah, F., Sulton, S., & Husna, A. (2021). Implementasi Penilaian Autentik Dalam Kurikulum 2013. JKTP: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 4(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.17977/um038v4i12021p041

Adinda, W. N., Wahyuni, S., & Majidah S, K. (2020). Penilaian Autentik Pada Pembelajaran Kreativitas Anak Usia Dini di Annur I Sleman Yogyakarta. Jurnal Raudhah, 8(1), 92–104. http://jurnaltarbiyah.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/raudhah

Angkat, S. A., Wardhani, S., & Syahrial, S. (2024). Konsep Penilaian Autentik dalam Evaluasi Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. Pubmedia Jurnal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Indonesia, 1(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47134/ptk.v1i3.432

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009200119

Bolden, B., Deluca, C., Kukkonen, T., Roy, S., & Wearing, J. (2019). Assessment of Creativity in K-12 Education : A Scoping Review. Review of Education: An International Journal of Major Studies in Education, 8(2), 343–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3188

Carney, S. (2022). Reimagining our futures together: a new social contract for education, Comparative Education. by UNESCO. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2022.2102326

Darling-hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Febriani, R. (2021). Implementasi Penilaian Autentik pada Pembelajaran Tematik di Sekolah Dasar. Mitra PGMI: Jurnal Kependidikan MI, 7(2), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.46963/mpgmi.v7i2.367

Fernanda, S. A., Fernica, V. O., & Pratama, M. B. (2025). Penerapan Evaluasi Autentik Dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Pancasila Di Tingkat Sekolah Dasar. Menulis: Jurnal Penelitian Nusantara, 1(5), 334–340. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59435/menulis.v1i5.277

Janse van Rensburg, C., Coetzee, S. A., & Schmulian, A. (2022). Developing digital creativity through authentic assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(6), 857–877. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1968791

Jendriadi, Irdawati, Marlina, Asmelawati, Lovita, N., & Titin, E. D. (2025). Implementasi Penilaian Autentik dalam Pembelajaran di SDN 16 Nan Sabaris. Jurnal Edumatika, 2(1), 147–155. https://mail.ojs.unitas-pdg.ac.id/index.php/edumatika/article/view/1163

Khoerunnisa, S., Atiqoh, S., Lathifah, S., Akil, & Azis, A. (2025). Competency And Character Based Integrative Assessment Model In Islamic Religious Education (PAI) Learning. Classroom: Journal of Islamic Education, 2(1), 129–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61166/classroom.v2i1.27

Lame, G. (2019). Systematic literature reviews: An introduction. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, 2019-Augus(August), 1633–1642. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.169

Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 339. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700

Linnenluecke, M. K., Marrone, M., & Singh, A. K. (2020). Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management, 45(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896219877678

Lisliningsih, N., Mariyanti, N., Nurul Fajri, & Arifmiboy. (2024). Konsep Penilaian Autentik (Autentik Asesmen). Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmiah Transformatif, 8(11), 30–37.

Mccallum, M. L. (2010). Characterizing author citation ratings of herpetologists using Harzing’s Publish or Perish. Herpetology Notes, 3(1), 239–245.

Moneta, G. B., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). The Effect of Perceived Challenges and Skills on the Quality of Subjective Experience. Journal of personality, 64(2), 275–310.

Mueller, J. (2005). The Authentic Assessment Toolbox: Enhancing Student Learning through Online Faculty Development. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 1–7. https://jolt.merlot.org/documents/VOL1No1mueller.pdf

Muhaymin Hakim Abdullah, Lutfan Jaes, Mohd Zulfadli Rozali, Nurizyani Azhar, Yuslizar Kamaruddin, & Asyraf Maula. (2022). Analisis tinjauan literatur sistematik (SLR): elemen humanisme dalam sistem pendidikan. Human Sustainability Procedia, 2(2), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.30880/hsp.2022.02.02.007

Nuriza, R., & Muniroh, S. M. (2025). Strategi Asesmen Autentik untuk menanamkan Karakter Religius dalam Pendidikan Dasar. Jurnal Inovasi Strategi Dan Model Pembelajaran, 5(2), 170–179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51878/strategi.v5i2.5401

Nurlita, M., & Gusmalinda, R. (2020). Pengaruh Penilaian Autentik dan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Buton Tengah. Jurnal Akademik Pendidikan Matematika, 6, 62–66. https://doi.org/10.55340/japm.v6i1.199

Palm, T. (2008). Performance Assessment and Authentic Assessment : Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 13(4), 1–11. http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=13&n=4 %5Cn

Pantiwati, Y. (2013). Authentic Assessment for Improving Cognitive Skill , Critical- Creative Thinking and Meta-Cognitive Awareness. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(14), 1–10.

Purwananti, Y. S. (2016). Peningkatan Kualitas Pendidikan Sebagai Pencetak Sumber Daya Manusia Handal. Proceedings International Seminar FoE (Faculty of Education), 220–229.

Putri, A. A., & Juandi, D. (2022). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Ditinjau dari Self Efficacy: Systematic Literature Review (SLR) di Indonesia. Symmetry: Pasundan Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning and Education, 7(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.23969/symmetry.v7i2.6493

Ramli, R., Lestari, U., Taufik, Hamran, & Syamsuriah. (2025). Pengembangan Model Penilaian Autentik dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di Sekolah Dasar. Arus Jurnal Psikologi Dan Pendidikan, 4(3), 581–587. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.57250/ajpp.v4i3.1790

Rifky, S., Putra, J. M., Ahmad, A. T., Widayanthi, D. G. C., Abdullah, G., Sunardi, S., & Syathroh, I. L. (2024). Pendidikan yang Menginspirasi: Mengasah Potensi Individu. Yayasan Literasi Sains Indonesia

Robinson, K. (2006). Do Schools Kill Creativity? In Presentation at TED2006 conference. Monterey, CA. https://www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_says_schools_kill_creativity

Rofiatun Nisa’, Sukiyanto, & Latifatul Mujtahidah. (2019). Pengaruh Kreativitas Guru Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Peserta Didik Mata Pelajaran Matematika. Cendekia, 11(2), 89-98. https://doi.org/10.37850/cendekia.v11i2.104.

Sahra, A. P., Komalasari, K., Kayyis, I. I., Andrian, M., & Iskandar, S. (2025). Evaluasi Manajemen Sekolah Dasar Studi Kasus dalam Menantang Paradigma Konvensional dan Menciptakan Inovasi Pendidikan Berkelanjutan. Jurnal Ilmiah Global Education, 6(2), 313–322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v6i2.3818

Sangadah, R., Musrikah, & Chotimah, C. (2025). Strategi Penilaian Autentik ( Authentic Assessment ) Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Pada Kurikulum Merdeka Di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 3(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59829/yb9rg865

Stiggins, R. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment FOR learning: A path to success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170508700414

Syarifah, S., Natibah, S., Hamzah, R., & Najmudin, D. (2025). Model Evaluasi Autentik Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik. Celebes Journal of Elementary Education, 3(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31605/cjee.v3i2.5144

Taguma, M., Gabriel, F., Hwee, L. I. M. M., & Expert., O. E. C. D. (2019). Future of Education and Skills 2030: Curriculum analysis. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), May 2019, 1–58.

Teibang, D. (2025). Evaluasi Hasil Asesmen Melalui Pemberian Umpan Balik dalam Tes Formatif sebagai Tolak Ukur Hasil Belajar Siswa. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(2), 2236–2242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v8i2.6836

Thomas, M. balia. (2021). The Everyday Creativity of Authentic Classroom Assessments. LEARNing Landscapes, 14(1), 293–407. https://doi.org/10.36510/LEARNLAND.V14I1.1039

Tomlinson, C. A., & Moon, T. R. (2013). Assessment and student success in a differentiated classroom. ASCD.

Uri, F., & Saputra, D. (2025). Pengembangan Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Pendidikan Islam. IMTIYAZ: Jurnal Ilmu Keislaman, 9(2), 367–391. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46773/imtiyaz.v9i2.2111

Wiggins, G. (1990). The case for authentic assessment. - practical assessment, research & evaluation. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 2(2), 1–3. http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=2&n=2

Zubaidah, S. (2018). Keterampilan Abad ke-21. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, June, 1–25.

Published
2026-04-09
How to Cite
Aminuddin, M. Y. (2026). Authentic Assessment Management Strategies for Enhancing Student Creativity in Islamic Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Cendekia Media Komunikasi Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Islam, 18(01), 239-254. https://doi.org/10.37850/cendekia.v18i01.1288